|Drug Addiction: A is for Abstinence|
|The shaping of policy at UNODC (2002-2010)|
Posted: 17 July 2008
I have been arguing for some time, based on evidence from the World Drug Report, that the world drug problem is stabilizing. But containing the problem does not go far enough. If we are to reduce the number of people who are dependent on drugs, then more attention must be paid to drug prevention and treatment.
That means adopting a drug control policy that puts health first. After all, health is the first principle of drug control.
I am not just talking about band aid solutions that address symptoms rather than causes. What is needed is a comprehensive range of measures, from abstinence and prevention, to treatment, and reducing the health and social consequences of drug abuse: a continuum of care properly financed, and part of mainstream health and social services.
The HIV/AIDS campaign is based on the A-B-C principle, with A standing for Abstinence. We need similar principles for drug-related programs, stretching from A to Z (or whatever you may wish), assigning however the same meaning to A.
Governments, international institutions and concerned citizens should not shy away from proclaiming the importance of avoiding drugs. Unfortunately, the opposite is happening in so many societies: while tobacco smokers are ostracized, it is those who do not take drugs that are marginalized. What about standing by their side? What about proclaiming loud and clear the virtue of drug abstinence?
Something else. Some of the (implicit) messages I hear are startling: take drugs if you so wish, and we teach you how to reduce the damage they cause. This is not only counter-intuitive: it is plainly wrong. Harm reduction, on its own, is necessary, but not sufficient. If not integrated into more complex drug control processes that start with abstinence and treatment, harm reduction only perpetuates drug use. Would you tell an obese friend: have more sweets my dear, then get an insulin shot? I don't think so. So let's be evidence based, and coherent when it comes to drug control.
This is the message that I made at the recent NGO Forum called Beyond 2008, particularly to leaders of the harm reduction movement, in an effort to follow a more balanced drug control policy. It is a message that I will repeat again and again until more attention and resources are given to reducing demand for drugs. Let's steer people away from drugs, not only help them once they become addicted.
|Last Updated on Thursday, 20 January 2011 11:11|
- (3) The Mammon Prize for Outstanding Greed
- My Corner
- Drug Trafficking into West Africa
- Raping the Planet
- Birds of prey on Congo
- (1) A novel about politics, finance & crime
- The world’s deadliest drug trade: facts and figures Afghanistan gets 5% the world’s heroin money and 100% the blame International Forum on “Drug Production in Afghanistan: A Challenge to the International Community”
|Aceh: Paradise Rediscovered|
Posted: 1 February 2013
Can you think of a region so poor that income is less than one dollar a day per person: that has gone through a war against the central government for 30 years (1975-2005); that in 2004 was submerged by a tidal wave (the tsunami) that killed 170,000 people out of a total population of 3 million (in other words 1 person out of every 20); that was later submerged by an avalanche of assistance personnel that pushed local prices beyond what locals could afford?
Well, let me help you.
The Aceh peninsula of Northern Indonesia, along the strategic Malacca Straits, is where I went on mission yesterday, with a delicate task: to determine the extent of drug production (cannabis cultivation); trafficking (hashish and methamphetamine); the associated crime and violence; the health impact (including the spread of HIV because of drug-injection); and, above what can be done to put an end to all this through development.
|Disrupt criminal markets, not just the mafias High-level meeting of the UN General Assembly on transnational organized crime|
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
In the past quarter century, organized crime has gone global. It has reached macro-economic and armed dimensions to become a threat to the stability of nations. The report on The Globalization of Crime issued today by my office (the UN Office on Drugs and Crime) provides the first comprehensive assessment of global crime markets: drugs, arms, modern slaves, illicit resources, counterfeits, as well as maritime piracy and cyber-crime.
The threat is not just economic. The threat is strategic, as criminals today can influence elections, politicians and the military – in one word, they buy power.
Some governments are unable to resist, as they lack the resourcess. Some others would be able to contain the problem, but show a benign neglect -- and I have in mind some rich nations.